Structuring Partner Nonrecourse Advances to Partnerships in Light
of the Proposed Cancellation of Indebtedness Regulations
By John C. McCoy, Esq.
Arent Fox, LLP, Washington, DC
On October 31, 2008, the Treasury published Prop. Regs.
§§1.108-8 and 1.721-1(d) addressing the tax consequences of
a contribution of partnership debt to the capital of a partnership in
exchange for a partnership interest. The proposed regulations provide
that, as a general rule: (i) the partnership must recognize
cancellation of indebtedness (“CoI”) income to the extent
the face amount of the debt exceeds the amount the creditor would
receive if the partnership sold all of its assets for their fair
market values and liquidated; (ii) the creditor does not recognize
gain or loss on the contribution of the debt in exchange for a
partnership interest; and (iii) the creditor's basis in the debt
becomes basis in his partnership interest.
As the example below illustrates, the proposed regulations' failure
to provide a special rule for partner nonrecourse liabilities means
that a contribution (or deemed contribution) of a partner's
nonrecourse loan (with a liquidating value which is less than face) to
capital will require the partner to recapture partner nonrecourse
deductions as current ordinary income in exchange for a deferred
capital loss. Although the tax problem could, and in the writer's view
should, be eliminated by providing that the debt's liquidating value
would be deemed to be at least equal to the contributing partner's
partner nonrecourse deductions, the absence of such a proviso requires
a partner who is considering advancing funds to a partnership as a
loan (rather than as preferred capital) to weigh the potential
economic advantage of participating parri passu with other
unsecured creditors against the potential tax disadvantage of
converting ordinary deductions into deferred capital losses.
Example: A & B form a 50-50 LLC (M) with each of
them contributing initial capital of $ 10,000. A advances an
additional $75,000 which is to be repaid prior to any repayments of
the initial capital. M purchases two buildings for $500,000 each and
each building secures a third party mortgage loan of $462,500 with
each mortgage lender's sole recourse being against the building
securing its loan. M has ordinary losses of $20,000 in year one and
$50,000 in year two; as of the end of year two the buildings are worth
$400,000 each. In year three, the mortgage lenders acquire the
buildings through deeds in lieu of foreclosure.
As the schedule below illustrates, the nature and timing of losses
allocated to A from inception through the transfers to the mortgage
lenders are identical whether A's advances have been classified as
loans or as priority capital. However, if the advances were loans, A
is holding a loan receivable with a $75,000 tax basis and has a
negative capital account of $75,000.
Absent unusual circumstances, a loan to a partnership from a
noncorporate partner is a non-business bad debt. Accordingly, claiming
a bad debt deduction would result in A recognizing a $75,000 short
term capital loss and M recognizing $75,000 of CoI (i.e.,
ordinary) income all of which would be allocable to A. If A were
deemed to have contributed the loan to M's capital, under the proposed
regulation M would have $75,000 ($75,000 face value over a zero
liquidating value) of CoI income (all allocable to A) and A would have
a $75,000 long term capital loss on the liquidation of his partnership
interest. (A's 0 basis in his partnership interest is: increased by
his $75,000 basis in the loan (per §722); decreased by $75,000
(per §752(b)); and increased by the $75,000 of CoI income.)
It is believed that in such circumstances most taxpayers did not
report additional gain or loss on the partnership's liquidation,
perhaps justifying their position on the ground that it should be
treated as though the creditor partner had assumed the debt from the
partnership (i.e., should be treated as having made a capital
contribution equal to the debt's face amount). The lack of
administrative or judicial authorities addressing the issue suggests
that IRS agents either accepted or overlooked such
treatment.
|
If Priority Capital
|
| If a Loan |
|
LLC Bal Sheet |
A&B's Bases |
|
LLC Bal Sheet |
A&B's Bases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of Year One |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings (net of depreciation) |
975,000 |
|
|
975,000 |
|
|
Other assets |
25,000 |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
3rd party nonrecourse mortgages |
925,000 |
|
|
925,000 |
|
|
Loan from A |
N/A |
|
|
75,000 |
75,000 |
|
A's Ordinary Loss |
10,000 |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
B's Ordinary Loss |
10,000 |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
A's Capital Account |
75,000 |
537,500 |
|
0 |
537,500 |
|
B's Capital account |
0 |
462,500 |
|
0 |
462,500 |
|
End of Year Two |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings (net of depreciation) |
950,000 |
|
|
950,000 |
|
|
Other assets |
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
3rd party nonrecourse mortgages |
925,000 |
|
|
925,000 |
|
|
Loan from A |
N/A |
|
|
75,000 |
75,000 |
|
A's Ordinary Loss |
50,000 |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
A's Capital Account |
25,000 |
487,500 |
|
(50,000) |
487,500 |
|
B's Capital Account |
0 |
462,500 |
|
0 |
462,500 |
|
Following Year 3 foreclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
Loan from A |
N/A |
|
|
75,000 |
75,000 |
|
A's Section 1231 loss |
25,000 |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
A's Capital Account |
0 |
0 |
|
(75,000) |
0 |
|
B's Capital Account |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
For more information, in the Tax Management Portfolios, see
McCoy, 538 T.M., Bad Debts, and in Tax Practice Series, see
¶1040, Discharge of Indebtedness.
|